CELG(4) HA 30
Communities, Equality and Local Government Committee
Inquiry
into Home Adaptations
Response from : Older People’s Commissioner for Wales: additional written evidence 1
Aids and Adaptations
List of good practice provided by Welsh local authorities – December 2012
Joint Working
· Co-location of OTs with grant officers has reduced waiting list from two years in 2010 to two months
· Council has employed on a trial basis an adaptations coordinator to bridge OT and adaptations teams.
· Invested in additional OT support to speed up the assessment process
· Managed by an integrated disabled person’s service including surveyors, OTs.
· Close links with RSLs who delivery PAGs
· Workshop bringing together officers from social services and housing
· Monthly meetings between Housing and OT
· Joint working between housing and OTs (colocation)
· Reorganisation of OT into a single service team
· Officer seconded to Housing Renewal Team
· Good joint working with OTs
· Close partnership with C&R (co-located with the council).
Use of resources
· Acknowledged timescales need to be reduced and have invested officer time and financial resources. This has reduced delivery time from 809 to 399 over three years.
· Cabinet considering proposals for additional resources
· Funding to Care and Repair
· Provision of sufficient capital to adaptations even in financially challenging times – no applicant has to wait for grant assistance as a result of lack of funds
· Recycling of equipment
· Living Independently Home Repair Grant tackles other works of repair e.g. roofs or electrics at same time as DFG.
· Strong financial support, consistent capital allocation
Customer experience
· Recently started monitoring feedback from clients, for example 82% of people who received a DFG felt it helped them stay independent.
· Telephone based enquiry service and home visit options for applicants
· In house agency service to hand hold applicants through the process.
· Early draft means test to give potential applicants a very early indication of any financial contribution
· Root and Branch review in 2007 to identify process efficiencies, streamline customer journey. Reduced from 500+ days to 175 days
· Customer satisfaction levels high (95%)
· Home visits
‘Process’ issues
· Changes to Housing Renewal Policy specifically aimed at reducing delivery times over the next 12 months.
· Partnership with LSVT with a panel to consider applications for adaptations, including moving to a new property.
· Tighten up on targets for each step of DFG process
· Joint pre-referral visit by housing surveyor and OT to ensure any recommendations are reasonable and practical
· Fast track procedure for urgent cases
· Prioritisation system to deal with most urgent cases first
· Using surveyors as assessors to reduce OT waiting times
· More accurate recording
· Fast track stair like service for palliative care
· Refining application process
· E-referal process from OT to grants team
· Dedicated team with specialist OTs
· Fast track for priority cases
Alternatives to DFG
· Minor works commissioned separately
· Prioritising hospital discharge for minor adaptations
· Partnership with Care and Repair to deliver minor adaptations and the RRAP programme (average time 4 days)
· Safety at Home Scheme: partnership between OT and C&R (delivered 454 minor adaptations last year, average time 6 days)
· Discretionary relocation grant via Pathways to Adapted Housing Register
· Minor adaptations Grant for less than £2k (average 59 days)
· Financial incentive to move
· 11 days to deliver minor adaptations
· Loans and grants for other repairs and improvements
Contractors / building work
· Recently re-tendered for building contractors
· Framework contract with local contractors – with agreed timescales and schedule of rates
· Approved contractor agreements.
· One experienced local architect
· Joint feasibility visits OT and grants
· Expert local contractors
· Schedule of rates (removed tendering)
· In house grant agency
· Registered Builders Scheme – advice on sourcing a builder